Celeron 3965Y vs Turion 64 ML-30

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-7020U Core i3-7100U Core i5-7200U Core i5-7300U Core i7-7Y75 Core i7-7500U Core i7-7600U Core m3-7Y30 Pentium 4415U

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.16
Celeron 3965Y
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.75
+369%

Celeron 3965Y outperforms Turion 64 ML-30 by a whopping 369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
Celeron 3965Y Celeron 3965Y

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32892666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.4311.83
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)21 April 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate800 MHz4 GT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket754FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 615
Max video memoryno data16 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.16 0.75
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron 3965Y has a 368.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 3965Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-30 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-30 and Celeron 3965Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Intel Celeron 3965Y
Celeron 3965Y
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 Pentium 4 M P4-M 1,7
Celeron 3965Y Celeron 3965Y
vs
A4-3300M A4 3300M
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-28
Mobile Pentium 4 552 Mobile Pentium 4 552
vs
Ryzen 3 3350U Ryzen 3 3350U
Athlon II Neo K125 Athlon II Neo K125
vs
Mobile Pentium 4 2.80 Mobile Pentium 4 2.80
Core 2 Solo SU3500 Core 2 Solo SU3500
vs
A4-5050 A4 5050
Core 2 Solo SU3500 Core 2 Solo SU3500
vs
E1-6010 E1 6010
Core 2 Solo SU3500 Core 2 Solo SU3500
vs
Ryzen 3 3200U Ryzen 3 3200U
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
i7-6660U Core i7 6660U
Mobile Pentium 4 520 Mobile Pentium 4 520
vs
A4-5050 A4 5050
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
i5-4220Y Core i5 4220Y
Mobile Sempron 2800+ Mobile Sempron 2800+
vs
Pentium M 1.50 Pentium M 1.50
Pentium M 705 Pentium M 705
vs
A4-5050 A4 5050

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 31 vote

Rate Celeron 3965Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-30 or Celeron 3965Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.