Ryzen 3 3200U vs Core 2 Solo SU3500

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiencyno data15.02
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Picasso-U (Zen) (2019)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB128K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA956FP5
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 1468
Ryzen 3 3200U 4258
+190%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 654
Ryzen 3 3200U 3755
+475%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Solo SU3500 112.25
Ryzen 3 3200U 14.03
+700%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2009 6 January 2019
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3500 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 3200U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3500 and Ryzen 3 3200U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1457 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3500 or Ryzen 3 3200U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.