Celeron N2806 vs Turion 64 ML-28

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$9.95 no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Bus support800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB56K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm22 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Turion 64 ML-28 254
Celeron N2806 485
+90.9%

Celeron N2806 outperforms Turion 64 ML-28 by 91% in Passmark.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Turion 64 ML-28 566
Celeron N2806 1195
+111%

Celeron N2806 outperforms Turion 64 ML-28 by 111% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 4 Watt

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-28 and Celeron N2806, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-28
Turion 64 ML-28
Intel Celeron N2806
Celeron N2806

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 27 votes

Rate Celeron N2806 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-28 or Celeron N2806, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.