Mobile Sempron 2600+ vs Turion 64 ML-28

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-28 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Mobile Sempron
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Dublin
Release dateJune 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-28 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nmno data
Die size125 mm2no data
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-28 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-28 and Mobile Sempron 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion 64 ML-28 254
Mobile Sempron 2600+ 256
+0.8%

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Mobile Sempron 2600+ has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-28 and Mobile Sempron 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-28 and Mobile Sempron 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-28
Turion 64 ML-28
AMD Mobile Sempron 2600+
Mobile Sempron 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Sempron 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-28 or Mobile Sempron 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.