Celeron N2806 vs Athlon Neo X2 L335
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon Neo | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 1 October 2009 (14 years ago) | 1 December 2013 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.58 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | ASB1 BGA | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 4.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Athlon Neo X2 L335 outperforms Celeron N2806 by 8% in Passmark.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron N2806 outperforms Athlon Neo X2 L335 by 3% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2009 | 1 December 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 4 Watt |
Celeron N2806 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Celeron N2806, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
