EPYC 7662 vs Samsung Exynos 850
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7662 outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by a whopping 3405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2163 | 35 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Samsung | AMD EPYC |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A55 (2019) | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 15 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 19 February 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | Socket SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 225 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | ARM Mali-G52 MP1 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7662 outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 3405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7662 outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 3412% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.34 | 46.97 |
| Recency | 15 May 2020 | 19 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 64 |
| Threads | 8 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm |
The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Samsung Exynos 850 in performance tests.
Be aware that Samsung Exynos 850 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Samsung Exynos 850 and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
