Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs EPYC 7662

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.97
+25.7%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
37.37

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen 9 7945HX3D by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3579
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
Release date19 February 2020 (4 years ago)28 July 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads12832
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache4 MB1 MB
L2 cache32 MB16 MB
L3 cache256 MB128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data89 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket SP3FL1
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size4 TiBno data
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7662 46.97
+25.7%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 37.37

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen 9 7945HX3D by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7662 72653
+25.7%
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 57796

EPYC 7662 outperforms Ryzen 9 7945HX3D by 26% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.97 37.37
Recency 19 February 2020 28 July 2023
Physical cores 64 16
Threads 128 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 55 Watt

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7662 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7662 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 85 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7945HX3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7662 or Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.