Pro A6-8500B vs i7-4860EQ

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-4860EQ
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 47 Watt
3.46
+243%
Pro A6-8500B
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.01

Core i7-4860EQ outperforms Pro A6-8500B by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15372453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Carrizo
Power efficiency6.976.37
Architecture codenameCrystalwell (2013−2014)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date29 August 2013 (11 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size264 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)100 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA1364FP4
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3/DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 5200AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Number of pipelinesno data256
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-4860EQ 3.46
+243%
Pro A6-8500B 1.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-4860EQ 5500
+244%
Pro A6-8500B 1601

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.46 1.01
Recency 29 August 2013 3 June 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 15 Watt

i7-4860EQ has a 242.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A6-8500B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-4860EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A6-8500B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-4860EQ and Pro A6-8500B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-4860EQ
Core i7-4860EQ
AMD Pro A6-8500B
Pro A6-8500B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-4860EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Pro A6-8500B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-4860EQ or Pro A6-8500B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.