Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX vs EPYC 7H12

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+108%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020
12 cores / 24 threads
21.67

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX by 108% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking39218
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money22.318.86
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years ago)14 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$1970 $1961

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 152% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads12824
Base clock speed2.6 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.03
+108%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 21.67

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX by 108% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+108%
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX 33506

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX by 108% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.03 21.67
Recency 18 September 2019 14 July 2020
Physical cores 64 12
Threads 128 24

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 28 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.