AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs EPYC 7H12

Price now 4100$
Games supported 100%
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 3200$
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating227
Place by popularity56no data
Value for money12.0410.53
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date18 September 2019
(3 years old)
14 July 2020
(2 years old)
Current price$4100 $3200
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm
Die size192 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++


Information on EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Thermal design power (TDP)280 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.


Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB2 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s126.38 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data


Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 81.23
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 50.63
  • Passmark


Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

EPYC 7H12 100817
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62845

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX by 60% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating 81.23 50.63
Recency 18 September 2019 14 July 2020
Boost clock speed 3300 4200
Base clock speed 2600 3500

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends


Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.

Competitors of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX by Intel

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX by Intel is Core i9-13900KS, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.

Intel Core i9-13900KS Core i9 13900KS

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 436 ratings

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 80 ratings

Rate AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.