Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 458 | 429 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 12.42 | 5.79 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen 2 (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 30 September 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | $396 | $1550 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 115% better value for money than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | SP3r2 | Socket AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950 by 4% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.27 | 14.82 |
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 30 September 2019 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
| Threads | 32 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 65 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
