FX-4100 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.81
+782%
FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.68

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms FX-4100 by a whopping 782% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4912069
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.39no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency7.641.64
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date13 July 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache1.125 MB192 KB
L2 cache6 MB4096 KB
L3 cache32 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size213 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors9600 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 14.81
+782%
FX-4100 1.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23088
+782%
FX-4100 2618

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 1190
+201%
FX-4100 396

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 7211
+619%
FX-4100 1003

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.81 1.68
Recency 13 July 2017 12 October 2011
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a 781.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX-4100, on the other hand, has 89.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 382 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 887 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or FX-4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.