FX-4100 vs Athlon 200GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 200GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.66
+57.4%

Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-4100 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 200GE and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16341970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.270.24
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$55no data
Current price$85 (1.5x MSRP)$28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 200GE has 1679% better value for money than FX-4100.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 200GE and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8192 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 200GE and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and FX-4100.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 200GE 2.66
+57.4%
FX-4100 1.69

Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-4100 by 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon 200GE 4115
+57.7%
FX-4100 2609

Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-4100 by 58% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon 200GE 892
+121%
FX-4100 404

Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-4100 by 121% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon 200GE 1858
+81.3%
FX-4100 1025

Athlon 200GE outperforms FX-4100 by 81% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.66 1.69
Recency 1 June 2018 12 October 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

The Athlon 200GE is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 200GE
Athlon 200GE
AMD FX-4100
FX-4100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 726 votes

Rate Athlon 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 832 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 200GE or FX-4100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.