V-Series V120 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 319 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.47 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | AMD V-Series |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 10 August 2017 (6 years ago) | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
| Current price | $493 (0.5x MSRP) | $23 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | SP3r2 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | Integrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| VirusProtect | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 60 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms V-Series V120 by 154% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms V-Series V120 by 2131% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
V-Series V120 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X by 1975% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms V-Series V120 by 3888% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 August 2017 | 12 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 1 |
| Threads | 32 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 25 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while V-Series V120 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and V-Series V120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
