EPYC 9654 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
2018
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
10.89
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
77.10
+608%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X by a whopping 608% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7286
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.28
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.6319.89
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date19 September 2018 (6 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)96
Threads16192
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3624
L1 cache96K (per core)6 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)96 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketSocket AM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X 10.89
EPYC 9654 77.10
+608%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X 16971
EPYC 9654 120176
+608%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X 1252
EPYC 9654 1827
+45.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X 6244
EPYC 9654 18626
+198%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.89 77.10
Recency 19 September 2018 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 96
Threads 16 192
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 360 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X has 242.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 608% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 62 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.