Xeon E5-2689A v4 vs Ryzen 7 7840S
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 452 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | 41.37 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 246.24 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 145 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2023 | 20 June 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 145 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7840S has an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 314.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2689A v4 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2689A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
