Xeon E5-2673 v4 vs Ryzen 7 7840S
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7840S outperforms Xeon E5-2673 v4 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2673 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 490 | 609 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Power efficiency | 40.54 | 9.11 |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | 5 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2673 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 40 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 23 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 5 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 50 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | 456.12 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 7200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2673 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FP7/FP7r2/FP8 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2673 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2673 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2673 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 7840S and Xeon E5-2673 v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.90 | 12.91 |
| Recency | 5 January 2023 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 20 |
| Threads | 16 | 40 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 135 Watt |
Ryzen 7 7840S has a 15.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 285.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2673 v4, on the other hand, has 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.
The Ryzen 7 7840S is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2673 v4 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2673 v4 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
