EPYC 7F52 vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7F52 outperforms Ryzen 7 4800H by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 673 | 192 |
| Place by popularity | 90 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.70 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 24.44 | 15.88 |
| Architecture codename | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 6 January 2020 (4 years ago) | 14 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $3,100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Multiplier | 29 | 35 |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | 156 mm2 | 74 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9800 Million | 3,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FP6 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68.27 GB/s | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.62 | 26.01 |
| Recency | 6 January 2020 | 14 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 16 |
| Threads | 16 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 240 Watt |
Ryzen 7 4800H has 433.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7F52, on the other hand, has a 123.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The EPYC 7F52 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 4800H in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 7 4800H is a notebook processor while EPYC 7F52 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 4800H and EPYC 7F52, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
