Celeron B820 vs Ryzen 7 1700X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	712	2750
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.58	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	AMD Ryzen 7	Intel Celeron
Architecture codename	Zen (2017−2020)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	2 March 2017 (7 years ago)	1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$86
Current price	$252 (0.6x MSRP)	$34 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	16	2
Base clock speed	3.4 GHz	1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	1.7 GHz
L1 cache	768 KB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	4096 KB	256K (per core)
L3 cache	16384 KB	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	192 mm2	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Number of transistors	4,800 million	504 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	AM4	FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	FMA3	+
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
My WiFi	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	+
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
FDI	no data	+
Fast Memory Access	no data	+
Status	no data	Discontinued
XFR	+	no data
SenseMI	+	no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	16 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	42.671 GB/s	21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	-	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video	-	-
Clear Video HD	-	-
Graphics max frequency	-	1.05 GHz
InTru 3D	-	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	-	2
eDP	-	+
DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+
SDVO	-	+
CRT	-	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820.

PCIe version	n/a	2.0
PCI Express lanes	20	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Celeron B820 by 1811% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	10.13	0.53
Recency	2 March 2017	1 July 2012
Physical cores	8	2
Threads	16	2
Cost	$399	$86
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700X and Celeron B820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---