Turion II Ultra M660 vs Ryzen 5 1600
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by a whopping 1085% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 882 | 2634 |
| Place by popularity | 51 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.30 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD Turion II Ultra |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 11 April 2017 (7 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | no data |
| Current price | $115 (0.5x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | AM4 | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | Dual-channel 400 MHz DDR2 memory controller, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| PowerNow | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by 1085% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by 99% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by 490% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.94 | 0.67 |
| Recency | 11 April 2017 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
The Ryzen 5 1600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II Ultra M660 in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Turion II Ultra M660 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Turion II Ultra M660, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
