EPYC 7532 vs Turion II Ultra M660
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7532 outperforms Turion II Ultra M660 by a whopping 4947% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3056 | 195 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Turion II Ultra | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.69 | 6.11 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (16 years ago) | 19 February 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin | Socket SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Ultra M660 and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.57 | 28.77 |
| Recency | 10 September 2009 | 19 February 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 32 |
| Threads | 2 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 200 Watt |
Turion II Ultra M660 has 471.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 4947.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion II Ultra M660 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion II Ultra M660 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
