Athlon II M320 vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking882not rated
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD Athlon II
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Caspian (2009)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data
Current price$115 (0.5x MSRP)$131

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus supportno data3200 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4Socket S1 (S1g3)
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization, DDR2 400 MHz Memory Controller
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
PowerNowno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR2
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1600 12285
+1553%
Athlon II M320 743

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Athlon II M320 by 1553% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1600 1071
+488%
Athlon II M320 182

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Athlon II M320 by 488% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1600 4587
+1311%
Athlon II M320 325

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Athlon II M320 by 1311% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 1600 4538
+153%
Athlon II M320 1795

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Athlon II M320 by 153% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1600 25970
+647%
Athlon II M320 3476

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Athlon II M320 by 647% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1600 8244
+394%
Athlon II M320 1668

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Athlon II M320 by 394% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 1600 6.85
+442%
Athlon II M320 37.16

Athlon II M320 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 442% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 1600 13
+1043%
Athlon II M320 1

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Athlon II M320 by 1043% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2017 10 September 2009
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Athlon II M320 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Athlon II M320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
AMD Athlon II M320
Athlon II M320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5505 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 31 vote

Rate Athlon II M320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Athlon II M320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.