FX-4100 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1280	1970
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.05	0.24
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Ryzen 3	no data
Architecture codename	Zen (2017−2020)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date	10 May 2018 (6 years ago)	12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price	$145	$28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has 3254% better value for money than FX-4100.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	no data	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz
L1 cache	384 KB	192 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	4096 KB
L3 cache	4 MB	8192 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Die size	209.78 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	71 °C
Number of transistors	4950 Million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	Socket AM4	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	no data	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR3
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	46.933 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100.

PCIe version	3.0	n/a
PCI Express lanes	12	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms FX-4100 by 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.40	1.69
Recency	10 May 2018	12 October 2011
Chip lithography	14 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	95 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and FX-4100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---