i5-470UM vs Phenom X3 8850

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X3 8850
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.72
+46.9%
Core i5-470UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.49

Phenom X3 8850 outperforms Core i5-470UM by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26902886
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency0.722.58
Architecture codenameToliman (2008)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release dateOctober 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads34
Base clock speedno data1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data10
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size285 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors450 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2+BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X3 8850 0.72
+46.9%
i5-470UM 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom X3 8850 1142
+46%
i5-470UM 782

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.49
Physical cores 3 2
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 18 Watt

Phenom X3 8850 has a 46.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

i5-470UM, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 427.8% lower power consumption.

The Phenom X3 8850 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-470UM in performance tests.

Note that Phenom X3 8850 is a desktop processor while Core i5-470UM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8850 and Core i5-470UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X3 8850
Phenom X3 8850
Intel Core i5-470UM
Core i5-470UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 30 votes

Rate Core i5-470UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X3 8850 or Core i5-470UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.