EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Xeon Phi 7295

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PhiAMD EPYC Embedded
Architecture codenameKnights Mill (2017)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date18 December 2017 (6 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores72 (Doheptaconta-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2888
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.5 GHz
Multiplier1515
L1 cache4.5 MB768 KB
L2 cache36 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.550-1.2Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSVLCLGA3647AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size384 GB512 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s34.13 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Max video memory1 GBno data
Graphics max frequency0 MHzno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes3632

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 December 2017 21 February 2018
Physical cores 72 8
Threads 288 8
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon Phi 7295 has 800% more physical cores and 3500% more threads.

EPYC Embedded 3201, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 966.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7295 and EPYC Embedded 3201, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7295
Xeon Phi 7295
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
EPYC Embedded 3201

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 14 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate EPYC Embedded 3201 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 7295 or EPYC Embedded 3201, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.