E2-6110 vs Phenom X3 8750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Phenom X3 8750
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
0.91
+28.2%
E2-6110
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.71

Phenom X3 8750 outperforms E2-6110 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25242694
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.904.46
Architecture codenameToliman (2008)Beema (2014)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads34
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size285 mm2no data
Number of transistors450 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2+FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom X3 8750 0.91
+28.2%
E2-6110 0.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom X3 8750 1445
+28.1%
E2-6110 1128

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Phenom X3 8750 301
+87%
E2-6110 161

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Phenom X3 8750 782
+76.1%
E2-6110 444

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.71
Physical cores 3 4
Threads 3 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Phenom X3 8750 has a 28.2% higher aggregate performance score.

E2-6110, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Phenom X3 8750 is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-6110 in performance tests.

Note that Phenom X3 8750 is a desktop processor while E2-6110 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom X3 8750 and E2-6110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom X3 8750
Phenom X3 8750
AMD E2-6110
E2-6110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 70 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 135 votes

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom X3 8750 or E2-6110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.