Phenom X3 8750 vs Pentium G6960
Aggregated performance score
Phenom X3 8750 outperforms Pentium G6960 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2440 | 2381 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.02 | 1.28 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Toliman (2008) |
| Release date | 9 January 2011 (13 years ago) | April 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Current price | $199 | $48 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Phenom X3 8750 has 6300% better value for money than Pentium G6960.
Technical specs
Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.93 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 382 million | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1156 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16.38 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Phenom X3 8750 outperforms Pentium G6960 by 11% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Phenom X3 8750 outperforms Pentium G6960 by 12% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Pentium G6960 outperforms Phenom X3 8750 by 52% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Pentium G6960 outperforms Phenom X3 8750 by 4% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 0.84 | 0.93 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 95 Watt |
The Phenom X3 8750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G6960 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G6960 and Phenom X3 8750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
