Phenom X3 8450e vs E2-6110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

E2-6110
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.71
Phenom X3 8450e
2008
3 cores / 3 threads, 65 Watt
0.79
+11.3%

Phenom X3 8450e outperforms E2-6110 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26942609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD E-Seriesno data
Power efficiency4.481.15
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Toliman (2008)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)September 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data285 mm2
Number of transistorsno data450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bAM2+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R2 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

E2-6110 0.71
Phenom X3 8450e 0.79
+11.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

E2-6110 1128
Phenom X3 8450e 1257
+11.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.79
Physical cores 4 3
Threads 4 3
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

E2-6110 has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Phenom X3 8450e, on the other hand, has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Phenom X3 8450e is our recommended choice as it beats the E2-6110 in performance tests.

Be aware that E2-6110 is a notebook processor while Phenom X3 8450e is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between E2-6110 and Phenom X3 8450e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD E2-6110
E2-6110
AMD Phenom X3 8450e
Phenom X3 8450e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 135 votes

Rate E2-6110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 5 votes

Rate Phenom X3 8450e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about E2-6110 or Phenom X3 8450e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.