7 160UL vs Pentium M 735

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesPentium Mno data
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Release date10 May 2004 (20 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cache32 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm10 nm
Die size87 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors144 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.988V-1.34Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA4781700
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2004 8 April 2024
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium M 735 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

7 160UL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, 900% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium M 735 is a notebook processor while Core 7 160UL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 735 and Core 7 160UL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735
Intel Core 7 160UL
Core 7 160UL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 160UL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium M 735 or Core 7 160UL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.