i3-2332M vs Pentium M 740
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2556 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Pentium M | Intel Core i3 |
Power efficiency | no data | 2.29 |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 19 January 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 September 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.73 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 22 |
L1 cache | 32 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 3 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 87 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 144 million | 624 million |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.26V-1.356V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | PPGA478, H-PBGA479 | G2 (988B) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M are enumerated here.
VT-x | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 19 January 2005 | 1 September 2011 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pentium M 740 has 29.6% lower power consumption.
i3-2332M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 740 and Core i3-2332M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.