Xeon Platinum 8376HL vs Celeron 220

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketPBGA479FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 RDIMM
Maximum memory sizeno data4.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 205 Watt

Celeron 220 has 978.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 8376HL, on the other hand, has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 220 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8376HL is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
Intel Xeon Platinum 8376HL
Xeon Platinum 8376HL

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 59 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8376HL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 220 or Xeon Platinum 8376HL, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.