A10-4657M vs Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Aggregate performance score
A10-4657M outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3315 | 2432 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4-M | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.51 | 3.00 |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | no data | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 246 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1303 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 1.10 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 has 16.7% lower power consumption.
A10-4657M, on the other hand, has a 587.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
The A10-4657M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
