Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs A6-4400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64
+300%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.16

A6-4400M outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4400M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27753294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesPentium 4-M
Power efficiency1.730.50
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A6-4400M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache96 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-4400M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7520G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4400M 0.64
+300%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 0.16

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-4400M 1804
+191%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 620

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-4400M 46.82
+428%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 247

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

A6-4400M has a 300% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

The A6-4400M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M
Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 188 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4400M or Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.