A10-4657M vs Pentium M 725
Primary details
Comparing Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2397 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium M | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.00 |
| Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 23 June 2004 (20 years ago) | 1 April 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 87 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 144 million | 1303 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.988V-1.34V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PPGA478 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | AMD Radeon HD 7660G |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 June 2004 | 1 April 2013 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 35 Watt |
Pentium M 725 has 400% lower power consumption.
A10-4657M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium M 725 and A10-4657M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
