FX-6100 vs PRO A12-9800

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

PRO A12-9800
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
2.40
+0.8%

PRO A12-9800 outperforms FX-6100 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16731676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.99
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date3 October 2016 (7 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Current priceno data$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data288 KB
L2 cache2048 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-9800 2.40
+0.8%
FX-6100 2.38

PRO A12-9800 outperforms FX-6100 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

PRO A12-9800 3705
+0.7%
FX-6100 3679

PRO A12-9800 outperforms FX-6100 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.40 2.38
Recency 3 October 2016 12 October 2011
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800 and FX-6100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800
PRO A12-9800
AMD FX-6100
FX-6100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 12 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 970 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800 or FX-6100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.