Athlon X4 950 vs FX-6100
Aggregated performance score
FX-6100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1670 | 1688 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 2.99 | 3.66 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 12 October 2011 (12 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $60 |
| Current price | $39 | $52 (0.9x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Athlon X4 950 has 22% better value for money than FX-6100.
Technical specs
FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 288 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 74 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
FX-6100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
FX-6100 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 2% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Athlon X4 950 outperforms FX-6100 by 73% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Athlon X4 950 outperforms FX-6100 by 34% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 2.36 | 2.30 |
| Recency | 12 October 2011 | 27 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
| Threads | 6 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Athlon X4 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
