A4-3310MX vs Opteron 6386 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6386 SE
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
5.36
+951%

Opteron 6386 SE outperforms A4-3310MX by a whopping 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking11062773
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.95no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameAbu Dhabi (2012)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date5 November 2012 (11 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,408no data
Current price$783 (0.3x MSRP)$136

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache768 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistors2,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FS1
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6480G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6386 SE 5.36
+951%
A4-3310MX 0.51

Opteron 6386 SE outperforms A4-3310MX by 951% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Opteron 6386 SE 8291
+960%
A4-3310MX 782

Opteron 6386 SE outperforms A4-3310MX by 960% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.36 0.51
Recency 5 November 2012 14 June 2011
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 35 Watt

The Opteron 6386 SE is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3310MX in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 6386 SE is a server/workstation processor while A4-3310MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6386 SE and A4-3310MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6386 SE
Opteron 6386 SE
AMD A4-3310MX
A4-3310MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 10 votes

Rate Opteron 6386 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 26 votes

Rate A4-3310MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6386 SE or A4-3310MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.