EPYC 9654 vs Sempron 140

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated4
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.12
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSargas (2009−2011)Genoa
Release dateJuly 2009 (14 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$40$11,805
Current price$99 (2.5x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads1192
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size117 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors234 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Sempron 140 486
EPYC 9654 122164
+25037%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Sempron 140 by 25037% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Sempron 140 310
EPYC 9654 1823
+488%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Sempron 140 by 488% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Sempron 140 316
EPYC 9654 18430
+5732%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Sempron 140 by 5732% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 192
Cost $40 $11805
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 360 Watt

We couldn't decide between Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Sempron 140 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 140 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 219 votes

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 983 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 140 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.