Xeon 3.06 vs Opteron 246

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

Comparing Opteron 246 and Xeon 3.06 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2004)Gallatin (2003−2004)
Release dateAugust 2003 (20 years ago)March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109no data
Current price$52 (0.5x MSRP)$89

Detailed Specifications

Opteron 246 and Xeon 3.06 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.07 GHz
L1 cache128 KB16K
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size193 mm2237 mm2
Number of transistors106 million286 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 246 and Xeon 3.06 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket940604
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt97 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Opteron 246 632
+18.6%
Xeon 3.06 533

Opteron 246 outperforms Xeon 3.06 by 19% in Passmark.

Pros & Cons Summary


Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 97 Watt

We couldn't decide between Opteron 246 and Xeon 3.06. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 246 and Xeon 3.06, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 246
Opteron 246
Intel Xeon 3.06
Xeon 3.06

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Opteron 246 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 246 or Xeon 3.06, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.