Xeon 3.06 vs Opteron 144

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 144
2003, $65
1 core / 1 thread, 85 Watt
0.18

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35453542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.090.08
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Gallatin (2003−2004)
Release dateJune 2003 (22 years ago)March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 144 and Xeon 3.06 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.07 GHz
L1 cache128 KB16K
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size193 mm2237 mm2
Number of transistors106 million286 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 144 and Xeon 3.06 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket940604
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt97 Watt

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 144 0.18
Xeon 3.06 0.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 144 316
Samples: 2
Xeon 3.06 320
+1.3%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 97 Watt

Opteron 144 has 14.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Opteron 144 and Intel Xeon 3.06.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 144
Opteron 144
Intel Xeon 3.06
Xeon 3.06

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate Opteron 144 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon 3.06 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 144 and Xeon 3.06, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.