Pentium M 778 vs Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Pentium M 778 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64Pentium M
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Pentium M 778 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Pentium M 778 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt10 Watt

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 10 Watt

Pentium M 778 has 520% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Pentium M 778. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Pentium M 778, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Intel Pentium M 778
Pentium M 778

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Pentium M 778 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ or Pentium M 778, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.