Pentium M 778 vs Celeron M 330

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MPentium M
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz400 MHz
L3 cache512 KB L2no data
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 10 Watt

Pentium M 778 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 330 and Pentium M 778, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 330
Celeron M 330
Intel Pentium M 778
Pentium M 778

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Pentium M 778 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 330 or Pentium M 778, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.