Celeron B810 vs FX-8320E

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Celeron B810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1503	2751
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.91	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Intel Celeron
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	2 September 2014 (9 years ago)	1 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$86
Current price	$140	$72 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Celeron B810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	8	2
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	1.6 GHz
L1 cache	no data	64K (per core)
L2 cache	8192 KB	256K (per core)
L3 cache	no data	2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	315 mm2	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	504 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Celeron B810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Celeron B810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
My WiFi	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
Flex Memory Access	no data	+
Demand Based Switching	no data	-
FDI	no data	+
Fast Memory Access	no data	+
Status	no data	Discontinued

Security technologies

FX-8320E and Celeron B810 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+
Anti-Theft	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Celeron B810 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Celeron B810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	no data	16.6 GB
Max memory channels	no data	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	no data	21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support	no data	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequency	no data	950 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8320E and Celeron B810 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	no data	2
eDP	no data	+
DisplayPort	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+
SDVO	no data	+
CRT	no data	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Celeron B810.

PCIe version	n/a	2.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E outperforms Celeron B810 by 542% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.21	0.50
Recency	2 September 2014	1 March 2011
Physical cores	8	2
Threads	8	2
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Celeron B810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---