Turion II Neo K665 vs Celeron M 330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Turion II Neo
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Geneva (2010)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache512 KB L2no data
Chip lithography130 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478S1g4
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

Turion II Neo K665 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 330 and Turion II Neo K665, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 330
Celeron M 330
AMD Turion II Neo K665
Turion II Neo K665

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Celeron M 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Turion II Neo K665 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 330 or Turion II Neo K665, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.