3015Ce vs FX-4350

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-4350
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
2.14
+58.5%

FX-4350 outperforms 3015Ce by an impressive 59% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4350 and 3015Ce processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17612125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.73no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Pollock (Zen)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$92 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4350 and 3015Ce basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4350 and 3015Ce compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FT5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4350 and 3015Ce. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-1600 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4350 and 3015Ce are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4350 and 3015Ce. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4350 and 3015Ce.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4350 2.14
+58.5%
3015Ce 1.35

FX-4350 outperforms 3015Ce by 59% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4350 3304
+57.8%
3015Ce 2094

FX-4350 outperforms 3015Ce by 58% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.14 1.35
Recency 29 April 2013 4 August 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 6 Watt

The FX-4350 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015Ce in performance tests.

Note that FX-4350 is a desktop processor while 3015Ce is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4350 and 3015Ce, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4350
FX-4350
AMD 3015Ce
3015Ce

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 507 votes

Rate FX-4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 13 votes

Rate 3015Ce on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4350 or 3015Ce, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.