Celeron N2840 vs EPYC Embedded 9755
Aggregate performance score
EPYC Embedded 9755 outperforms Celeron N2840 by a whopping 28074% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2 | 3467 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 7.94 | 2.01 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024−2025) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| Release date | 11 March 2025 (1 year ago) | 22 May 2014 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 128 | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 256 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 512 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 16x 70.6 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 133,040 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | SP5 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 500 Watt | 7.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.32 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Celeron N2840.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | 4 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 95.79 | 0.34 |
| Recency | 11 March 2025 | 22 May 2014 |
| Physical cores | 128 | 2 |
| Threads | 256 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 500 Watt | 7 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 9755 has a 28074% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N2840, on the other hand, has 7043% lower power consumption.
The AMD EPYC Embedded 9755 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron N2840 in performance tests.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 9755 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2840 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
