AMD EPYC Embedded 9755: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
EPYC Embedded 9755 provides server-grade benchmark performance at 95.83% of a leader's which is a 96-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
Contents
Summary
AMD started EPYC Embedded 9755 sales 11 March 2025. This is a high-end Turin architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at professional systems. It has 128 cores and 256 threads, and is based on 4 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 4100 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket SP5 processor with a TDP of 500 Watt. It supports DDR5 memory.
Primary details
EPYC Embedded 9755 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in the ranking | 3 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Market segment | Server | |
| Power efficiency | 7.93 | of 100.00 (Apple M4 (8 cores)) |
| Designer | AMD | |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | |
| Architecture codename | Turin (2024−2025) | |
| Release date | 11 March 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 128 | |
| Threads | 256 | |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | of 4.7 GHz (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX) |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | of 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS) |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | of 96 KB (Xeon 6990E+) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | of 2 MB (Xeon 6980P) |
| L3 cache | 512 MB (shared) | of 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X) |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | of 1.8 nm (Core Ultra 7 366H) |
| Die size | 16x 70.6 mm2 | |
| Number of transistors | 133,040 million | of 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X) |
| 64 bit support | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 9755 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) |
| Socket | SP5 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 500 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 9755. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | |
| AVX | + | |
| Precision Boost 2 | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 9755's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of a GPU integrated into EPYC Embedded 9755.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | of 144 (Threadripper PRO 7955WX) |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of EPYC Embedded 9755. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Send your test results of EPYC Embedded 9755.
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
