AMD EPYC 7H12 vs EPYC 7702

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 11641$
Games supported 100%
AMD EPYC 7702
AMD EPYC 7702
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
AMD EPYC 7H12
AMD EPYC 7H12
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 4250$
Games supported 100%

General info

Comparing EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rating172
Value for money0.609.46
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (3 years old)18 September 2019 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,450no data
Current price$11641 (1.8x MSRP)$4250
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads128128
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.35 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketTR4TR4
Thermal design power (TDP)200 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7702 56.04
EPYC 7H12 79.98
+42.7%
  • Passmark

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 67%

EPYC 7702 70637
EPYC 7H12 100817
+42.7%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms EPYC 7702 by 43% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 56.04 79.98
Recency 7 August 2019 18 September 2019
Boost clock speed 3350 3300
Base clock speed 0 2600
Thermal design power (TDP) 200 Watt 280 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7702 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User rating

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 24 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7702 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 445 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7702 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.