Ryzen 3 3250U vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
44.32
+1709%
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads
2.45

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 1709% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking381639
Place by popularitynot in top-10058
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation22.44no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Picasso (2019−2020)
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$1970 $430

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1284
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache4 MB192 KB
L2 cache32 MB1 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketTR4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size4 TiB32 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 44.32
+1709%
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.45

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 1709% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+1708%
Ryzen 3 3250U 3851

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by 1708% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 44.32 2.45
Recency 18 September 2019 6 January 2020
Physical cores 64 2
Threads 128 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 15 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1897 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.