AMD EPYC 7662 vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

EPYC 7H12
45.34

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7H12 by 5% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3934
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.01no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years old)19 February 2020 (4 years old)
Current price$6796 no data
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads128128
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)4 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)32 MB
L3 cache256 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.34
EPYC 7662 47.74
+5.3%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7H12 by 5% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
EPYC 7662 73321
+5.3%

EPYC 7662 outperforms EPYC 7H12 by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.34 47.74
Recency 18 September 2019 19 February 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 225 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 8 votes

Rate AMD EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.